|

c
o v e r s t o r y
Transgendered
Butches and FTM's: a uniquely Femme Perspective
by
Sonya Bolus f e a t u r
e s
Transgendered
Lesbian
by
Arlene Istar Lev
Passing
as the Pope - the Story of Joan English
by
Alison Phipps
c o l u m n
s
Health
by
Dr. Lipstick
Wealth
by
Ms. Moneygrrl
Sex
by
SexySuzi
Advice
by
Victoria
Femme
Perspective
by
DeAnna
Butch
Perspective
by
E.T. Turner Publisher's
Note
Contribute
to Femme
|
Transgendered
Lesbian
by Arlene Istar Lev
(Continued,
page 2)
This
bipolar view of gender assumes that not only are males and females
sexually "opposite" but that opposites always and naturally attract,
creating an inherent heterosexism that permeates our culture.
Even our most compassionate modern medical responses to transsexual
people, has involved a "changing sex" paradigm, where one must
abandon one sex, and "become" the other and, until very recently,
being heterosexual post surgery was a requirement to be approved
for sexual reassignment surgery. Sexual reassignment surgery,
in other words would take a gender dysphoric homosexual and remake
a "fixed" heterosexual.
In
western culture and throughout much of modern European thought
the relationship between sexual and gender identities has been
a confusing issue. In the 19th century, homosexual desire was
understood as a kind of gender dysphoria and distinctions were
not made between homosexuals and transgendered people; it was
assumed that gender variant people were homosexual and they were
called "inverts." Inverts were men and women who transgressed
the proper societal parameters by crossdressing and behaving as
the "other" sex. People who engaged in gay sex, but who did not
transgress gender expectations, were actually not considered homosexual.
This rendered all "straight appearing" gay people essentially
not gay (a theory, by the way, this femme's mother would find
appealing!). Homosexuals who did not transgress expected gender
expression were considered "perverts", meaning they were somehow
seduced by real homosexuals (i.e. inverts). Inverts were definitely
considered more pathological than perverts. As we deconstruct
our psychological history it becomes unclear whether these "inverts"
were people we would today call homosexual or transsexual, or
somehow both
Although
the term "invert" is clearly imperfect, this word may more adequately
define some dykes I have known better than either homosexual or
transsexual. Let me try to explain..
I
have always known myself to be a femme, even before I had language
for myself. In the early days of lesbian feminist liberation,
when the word femme was still synonymous with "not a real lesbian,"
I always knew that I was not like the other dykes. The things
that seemed to define my community, -- soft ball and flannel shirts
--, just didn't speak to me, though the political tenets of feminism,
and a passionate desire for women sexually, most certainly did.
Like
most lesbian-feminists I have had an ambivalent relationship to
gender expression. On one hand, masculinity was a synonym for
patriarchy so all forms of maleness was abhorred. On the other
hand, lesbians celebrated sisterhood by taking pride in doing
traditionally male tasks. However, I was also always attracted
to butches. Or perhaps I should say I was always attracted to
gender, and particularly gender transgression. I have always found
the extremes of gender fascinating from high high heels, to man
tailored shirts. I have a button that says, "I like my men in
dresses and my women in combat boots," and frankly that is true.
Since feminine clothing was "outlawed" in lesbian nation, most
of my friends, and myself, were wearing various versions of men's
clothing, and frankly I found this, well, appealing (at least
on other women).
continued
on page 3
|